Raphael Collignon vs Alexey Vatutin Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Second serve performance is a key factor to consider when predicting the outcome of a tennis match. Looking at the recent form, Vatutin has shown a slight advantage, winning 50.81% of points on their second serve compared to Collignon's 47.03%. This stat has a strong correlation with match prediction accuracy. Analyzing the return game stats, Vatutin has been able to capitalize on their opponent's second serve, winning 56.06% of those points. On the other hand, Collignon has won 50.07% of their opponent's second serve points. The success rate for first serve returns is also higher for Vatutin at 34.46% compared to Collignon's 30.26%. These return game stats are crucial in determining the favored player in this head-to-head matchup. Examining how the players perform under pressure, Vatutin has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent matches, while Collignon has saved 58.62%. This is an important statistic to consider for in-game betting predictions. Taking an overview of their performances over the past year, Vatutin has won 60.71% of their matches (W/L 51/33), whereas Collignon has a higher overall winning percentage of 74.71% (W/L 65/22). This gives us a prediction overview for their head-to-head matches. Looking at their performance on different surfaces, Vatutin has been most successful on hard courts, winning 60% of their matches (W/L 78/52). However, their performance on grass courts has been less impressive, with only a 25% win rate (W/L 1/3). In contrast, Collignon's best career surface is clay, with a win rate of 74% (W/L 101/35), while grass courts have been their least successful, winning 50% of matches (W/L 1/1). Considering the level at which they have been competing, Vatutin has mainly played on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, winning 65.85% of matches (W/L 27/14). Collignon, on the other hand, has played more matches at the same level, winning an impressive 83.72% (W/L 36/7). It is important to consider the event level when comparing players' stats to predict the favorite. In their head-to-head matches, Vatutin has won once, while Collignon has emerged victorious twice. They have played a total of 7 sets, with Vatutin winning 3 and Collignon winning 4. Their most recent encounter took place at the M 25 Koksijde, where Collignon secured a convincing victory with a score of 6-1 6-3. The average match time between these players in their previous head-to-head matches has been 1 hour, 46 minutes, and 40 seconds. This information can be useful in predicting the duration of a deciding set if the match goes that far. Looking specifically at deciding sets, Vatutin and Collignon have played one each, with Collignon winning on that occasion. This data becomes particularly relevant when trying to predict the outcome of a match that reaches the deciding set. In terms of extreme pressure situations like tiebreaks, they have played one tiebreak against each other, with Collignon emerging as the victor. This statistic can provide insights into how players perform in high-pressure moments. Examining the quality of their opponents, over the past year, Vatutin has faced opponents with an average ranking of 375.38, while Collignon has played against players with an average ranking of 336.77. This information can give an indication of the level of competition they have been up against. When a match goes to a deciding set, Vatutin has won 43% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, while Collignon has an impressive success rate of 63% in all their matches played on the tour. This is worth noting for live predictions and betting purposes. Considering the current event, it is important to analyze the players' performance in that particular tournament. Past player performance is valuable, but current event stats provide an indication of who is in form and performing well. It is also worth considering that some players may have a better track record at specific events, which can influence the outcome. Break point conversion is a significant factor in in-game live betting. Vatutin has converted 40.06% of breakpoint opportunities, while Collignon has converted 38.74% of their chances to break their opponents' serve. This statistic can provide valuable insight into betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.